Vietnam’s Minister of Public Security, Tô Lâm, has set forth an ambitious agenda for significant advancements in institutional reform, administrative simplification, and legal modernization by 2026. Speaking at the inaugural session of the Central Steering Committee for Institutional Perfection and Law Enforcement in Hanoi, Tô Lâm underscored the necessity for government bodies to produce tangible outcomes rather than merely symbolic gestures. The meeting was attended by key figures such as Lê Minh Hưng and Trần Thanh Mẫn, highlighting its importance on the national agenda.
Tô Lâm emphasized the importance of assessing reforms through the completion of legal documents, streamlined administrative processes, the resolution of legal challenges, and transparent leadership accountability. He has tasked ministries and agencies with the immediate implementation of the committee’s conclusions. This includes the establishment of monitoring systems and regular reporting on progress, delays, and any obstacles that might require intervention from higher authorities.
During the meeting, the committee reviewed several priority areas. These included enhancing the state economy, optimizing conditions for foreign investment, reducing administrative burdens, combating urban air pollution, and revising the criminal procedure framework. On the topic of foreign investment, the committee advocated for policies that enhance competitiveness, encourage technology transfer, and foster research and development. It also stressed the importance of green transformation and digital innovation, alongside better oversight of strategic investors and improved regional coordination to attract foreign capital.
In tackling urban air pollution, officials proposed a shift towards outcomes-based air quality management. This would be supported by modern environmental monitoring systems, stronger early-warning mechanisms, and clearer accountability for pollution sources. The committee also urged that administrative reform be seen as a continuous responsibility rather than a temporary initiative. It recommended a greater focus on post-inspection oversight and risk-based governance rather than relying heavily on pre-approval requirements.
Regarding judicial reforms, the committee is examining amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code. The goal is to find a balance between effective crime prevention and ensuring fairness, asset recovery, and support for socio-economic development. By addressing these comprehensive reforms, Vietnam aims to enhance its institutional framework, positioning itself better for future challenges and opportunities.
